SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 845

VIVEK JAIN
Rajat @ Ronak – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Agrawal for petitioner; Ms. Varidhi Pathak, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State; Avinash Zargar for respondent No. 4.

ORDER

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed a direction to the respondents for payment of pension and gratuity. The immediate cause of action is the legal heirship certificate dated 5.7.2022 issued by the Additional Collector in favour of the petitioner as well as the respondent No.4.

2. The petitioner is a 15 year old minor son of deceased government servant namely Smt. Kamini Luniya, who has expired on 10.4.2021 while in service. The dispute has arisen because the petitioner is living with his maternal uncle and is living separately from his father, who is impleaded as respondent No.4. Therefore, it is curious and unique case of a real father and son contesting for pensionary dues of deceased wife and mother respectively.

3. This Court vide order dated 9.7.2015 had directed the petitioner, his guardian or any other authorized family member so also the respondent No.4 to remain personally present before this Court. Today the petitioner Rajat @ Ronak is present along with Shri Rajendra Kumar s/o Parusram Luniya, who is his maternal uncle. The respondent No.4 - Rahul Kaushal, who is father of the petitioner is also present in Court.

4. The undisputed facts are that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top