SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 855

VIVEK AGARWAL, AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH
Lakhan Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhagirath Singh for petitioner; Sanjay Sarwate for respondent.

ORDER

Agarwal, J:-- 1. Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 4.12.2024 passed by the learned First Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Katni whereby learned trial Court closed the right of the petitioner to cross-examine the witness Krishnakant, taking this fact into consideration that before lunch Shri Manu Tiwari had started crossexamination of this witness Krishnakant and post lunch he did not appear, therefore, right to cross-examination has been closed. It is noted by the learned trial Court that on previous dates i.e. 3.7.2024 witness Krishnakant was present but adjournment was sought on account of health grounds of the father of the counsel, which was given at a cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only). On 29.7.2024, witness was present but time was sought on the ground that Manu Tiwari was busy in High Court, then again time was granted. Then on 10.9.2024, witness Krishnakant was present but Manu Tiwari had sought time to cross-examination, which was granted at a cost of Rs.1000/-(Rupees One Thousand Only). Thereafter, matter was taken up on 4.12.2024, witness was present, cross-examination began at 12.30 PM, it was closed due to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top