SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 864

VISHAL DHAGAT, ANURADHA SHUKLA
Ruchit Kulseja – Appellant
Versus
Sneha Wadhwani Kulseja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Deepak Panjwani for appellant; Zaheer Khan Pathan for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Dhagat, J:-- 1. Appellant has preferred this appeal under section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging judgment and decree dated 18.1.2024 passed by Third Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur in RCSA No. 180/2022, by which petition filed for grant of divorce under section 27 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that appellant and respondent got their marriage registered on 10.6.2019 in Pune. After getting marriage certificate, parties also performed marriage on 10.11.2019 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals. Trial Court framed singular issue, whether respondent treated appellant with cruelty which calls for dissolution of marriage between them. Trial Court did not answer said issue but dismissed petition for divorce on ground that appellant want divorce for marriage dated 10.6.2019, however, no relief of dissolution of marriage dated 10.11.2019 was prayed, which was performed according to Hindu rites and rituals.

3. Counsel appearing for appellant submitted that trial Court had committed an error of law in dismissing suit on aforesaid ground. If trial Court gave divorce in respect of marriage dated 10.6.2019, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top