SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 866

ASHISH SHROTI
Rahul Singh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.P.S. Raghuvanshi with Dharmendra Singh Raghuvanshi for petitioner; Jitesh Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order, dated 15.9.2023 (Annexure P/1) whereby petitioner's request for grant of compassionate appointment has been rejected by virtue of Clause 4.1 of policy, dated 29.9.2014.

2. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the petitioner's father, late Shri Shiromani Singh Parmar, as working as Officiating Head Constable in 29th Battalion, SAF, Datia. He expired on 1.2.2022 while in service. After his death, the petitioner applied for grant of compassionate appointment on 17.1.2023 (Annexure P/6). This application has been rejected by impugned order, dated 15.9.2023.

3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been denied the benefit of compassionate appointment by invoking Clause 4.1 of the policy, dated 29.9.2024, on ground that her sister is already in the Government employment. He submitted that the petitioner's sister has already married on 9.12.2022 and, therefore, she cannot be considered to be a member of family of the deceased-father and, therefore, the provisions of Clause 4.1 of the policy are not attracted. He submitted that the petitioner's sister once m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top