SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 65

VIVEK RUSIA, PRADEEP MITTAL
Cent Bank Home Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chandar Singh Thakur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kamlesh Patel for petitioner.

ORDER

Rusia, J.-- 1. Petitioner has filed this review petition seeking review of the order dated 24.11.2025, whereby Writ Petition No.42858/2025 has been disposed of with a liberty to issue a fresh notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act in order to get an order under section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after issuing a fresh notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, nothing will remain in the Securitisation Application filed by the borrower pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur. Therefore, the impugned order should be reviewed.

3. In this case, the petitioner bank initially approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate under section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act to get support from the reviewing authorities for obtaining possession. Vide order dated 20.12.2023, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sehore, directed Tehsildar, Kannod Road, Aasta, Sehore, to get the possession of plot/house Kannod Road, Aasta Ward No.16 and hand over to the secured creditor. After almost one year, the possession of the ground floor of the house in question was taken, vide panchnama dated 16.12.2024, and the borrower was given 15 da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top