Back
S.K. Jha, C.J.
Salakhan Singh v. State of M.P.
Misc Cr. Case No. 2029 or 1992 (J); Decided no 17.7.1992*.
naM Áfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 439 && vfHk;qDr 2 1@2 o"kZ ls vf/kd le; rd tsy esa jgk && ls‘ku fopkj.k 4 ekl ds Hkhrj lekIr djus ds fy, mPp U;k;ky; ds iwfoZd funs‘k dk ikyu ugha fd;k x;k && vfHk;qDr dks U;kf;d vf/kdkfj;ksa dks fu"fdz;rk Hkksxus ds fy, ck/; ugha fd;k tk ldrkA
It is unfortunate that in spite of this Court's direction to the Courts below contained in the order dated 13.12.91 in Misc. Cr.C.No. 3809/91 to conclude the trial with in 4 months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order, the trial has not even commenced and the Sessions Judge, by his order dated 8.4.92, has issued a letter to the District Magistrate, Durg for appointment of a Public Prosecutor to conduct the case. The petitioners are in jail for more than 2 1/2 years now from 25.2.90. It was further directed by this Court in the order dated 13.12.91 that if the trial was not concluded within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order by the Sessions Court, the petitioners shall be at liberty to move this Court again for grant of bail.
I think it is a fit case in which the petitioners should be released on bail, for they ought not to be made to suffer on account of any-inaction or laxity on the part of the Judicial officers below, be he a Committing Magistrate or the Sessions Judge.
This bail application is accordingly allowed. It is directed that that each of the applicants Salkhansingh and Dalbirsingh alias Billa shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000.00 with two solvent sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Durg in Sessions Trial No. 132/92 of District Durg for their appearance in the Court concerned on all dates of hearing till the disposal of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
