SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 394

R.C.LAHOTI
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rambihari – Respondent


Advocates:
Arvind Dudawat Addl. Government Advocate for State; R.D. Jain for respondent.

JUDGMENT

The State of M.P. has come up in second appeal aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 3X 1987 passed by District Judge, Guna in Civil Appeal No. 14-A/82 whereby in reversal of the judgment and decree of the trial Court, the appellate Court has decreed the plaintiff /respondent's suit seeking declaration of the order of his dismissal from service as null and void with consequential direction to the appellants reinstating the respondent with all ancillary benefits.

The plaintiff/respondent was employed as a constable in Special Armed Forces and posted at Guna at the material time. The respondent was reported between 12.10.1980 and 14.10.1980 and sitting on indefinite hunger strike agitating his demands during this period, a show cause notice was issued to him, imputing therein certain acts amounting to a henious offence within the meaning of section 16 (a) of the M.P. Vishesh Sashatra Bal Adhiniyam, 1968.

Departmental enquiry was conducted against the respondent by one Apte and later on by one G.S. Rathore. The enquiry resulted in finding the guilt proved. Ultimately, an order of dismissal was passed against the respondent.

There was yet another Constable


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top