Back
V.D.GYANI, A.R.TIWARI
Laxmi Narayan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
This appeal arises out of the Judgment dated 25th August, 1987 delivered by the Second Additional Sessions judge, Ratlam in S.T.No.68 of 85 thereby holding the appellants guilty of offence punishable under S. 302 read with S.34 I.P .C. and sentencing them to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, further sentencing the appellants to undergo R.I. for one year.
The appellant No.3 Kaniram s/o Tekaji died during the pendency of this appeal.
The prosecution case, stated in brief, was that on 25th April, 1985 around 9 p.m. the appellants took away with them deceased Ranchhod under the pretext of offering him a cup of tea to a dilapidated house. Where he was offered tea and it is alleged that it was mixed with some poison. Having offered tea the accused persons left the place leaving behind Ranchhod. He was found lying there by witness Ganpatlal (P.W.11) who informed his relations. Vishram (P.W. 10) brother of Ranchhod came there and took him home. Dr. Garg from Bilpak was called, who gave two injections to Ranchhod. Thereafter he was rushed to P.H.C.Bilpak wherefrom he was transferred to the Civil Hospital, Ratlam. It was the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
