This revision has been preferred against an order dated 22.4.92 passed by III Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Morena.

A short point involved in the case is that certified copy of a registered sale deed was filed by the non-applicants in the Court. The Court accepted that document in evidence and rejected the objection raised by the petitioner against which the present revision has been filed.

The brief facts of the case are that the non-applicants 1 to 4 filed a suit for declaration of their title and for setting aside the sale deed executed by their father Shivnarayan in favour of the petitioners Vasudev and Kshatrapal alleging that the sale deed is void. Defence was that the sale deed was valid and was executed for legal necessity. The suit was decreed that the sale deed was valid for 1/3 rd share of Shivnarayan but invalid of 2/3rd share of the plaintiff. Two appeals were filed against that order in the High Court numbering 25/84 and 46/87. Both the appeals were decided by a common order and the case was remanded to the trial Court for further evidence and decision. It is at this stage, the certified copies of two other sale deeds were filed