SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 172

U.L.BHAT, A.R.TIWARI
Dilip Kumar Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Heard. Fourteen petitioners are persons whose occupation is putting up hoardings and collecting fees for allowing other persons to use the hoardings. They had their hoardings by the side of the roads within the Indore Municipal Corporation Limits. On the direction of the Corporation, they have shifted the hoardings and installed them by the side of Agra-Bombay Road which is part of National Highway No.3. They installed the hoardings at the places indicated with the permission of the Corporation which has granted licence to them. The period offence expires on 31.3.1994. They are aggrieved because before expiry of period of licence, the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., National Highway Circle, Palasia, Indore respondent No.2 is taking steps to remove the hoardings on the ground that the Corporation has no authority to licence such hoardings by the side of a particular road which is part of National Highway. They have, therefore, filed this writ petition seeking to restrain the respondents from removing or interfering with the hoardings and to direct the respondents to allow them to carry out their business of advertising through hoardings. Second respondents has filed re






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top