SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 864

U.L.BHAT
Ravi Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Arora – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Wadhwa for applicant; Masood Ali for non-applicant.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner married the respondent on 26.9.1976. They were separated on 2.8.1978. The petitioner filed a petition against his wife for divorce under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter 'the Act' for short) on the ground of adultery, desertion and cruelty. An ex-parte decree of divorce was passed on 27.9.1984. The respondent filed an application to setaside the ex-parte decree which was allowed. This order is now under challenge in this revision petition.

Learned counsel appearing for both the sides seek to invoke section 13-B of the Act. Sub-section (1) of section 13-B enables both the parties to the marriage to present a petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. Sub-section (2) states that on the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months thereafter and not later than eighteen months thereafter, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the Court shall, on being satisfied that a marriage has been solemnized and that the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top