SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 596

S.K.DUBEY
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.L Kochar for applicant; Girish Shrivaslava for State.

JUDGMENT

By this petition under section 397/401 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is being tried under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Trial No. 174/94 has challenged the order dated 2.5.1995 whereby his application for recalling two of the prosecution witnesses for cross-examination has been rejected.

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was represented by counsel Shri Chandrakar, who is a Junior counsel having been enrolled as an Advocate in the year 1994. The applicant having felt that he is not properly defended, engaged senior counsel to defend him. Senior counsel Shri Afzal Hussain, on going through the record moved an application under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for recalling the two witnesses, prosecutrix Saraswatibai (P.W. 7) and her husband Santosh (P.W. 8) for further cross-examination as no question were put on the prosecutrix regarding sexual intercourse by consent or by use of force, relating to injuries on the person of the prosecutrix and the manner in which the occurrence took place. De prosecutrix was also not confronted with her previous Statement and the first information report. To demonstra





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top