Back
SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Jumman Khan – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent
Appellant has preferred this appeal for the enhancement of the amount of compensation. The appellant was one of the claimants before the Motor Vehicle Claims Tribunal. The appellant was stated to have suffered injuries in the stated accident. It was further submitted that due to the accident he has suffered permanent disablement. Learned Tribunal found that the appellant could not prove any permanent disability, therefore, for the injuries suffered by the claimant the Tribunal allowed the compensation to the tune of Rs. 27,625/- with interest thereon at the rate of Rs. 12% per annum.
It is strenuously submitted by Shri Soni that the learned Claims Tribunal has wrongly held that the appellant did not suffer any permanent disablement. It is also contended that the Tribunal did not allow proper opportunity to the appellant to adduce evidence. It is also urged that in the facts and circumstances and evidence of the case the amount awarded is too mearge. On such contentions the prayer is made that the amount of compensation be enhanced.
We have considered the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for appellant. On the perusal of the impugned award and the record of the Tr
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
