SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 635

TEJ SHANKAR
Pran Kishen – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Council, Dabra – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Modi for applicant; T.C. Bansal for respondent.

JUDGMENT

This petition under section 182 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the complaint filed by the respondent. The point raised in the petition is short one.

Facts briefly narrated are that a complaint was filed by the Municipal Council, Dabra, against the petitioner on 31.1.1997 under Municipalities Act, 1961, with the allegation that he was liable to pay terminal tax as per Terminal Tax (Assessment and Collection) on the Goods Exported under M.P. Municipal Limits Rules, 1987. The petitioner was directed to pay the terminal tax but neither it furnished the return nor deposited the amount of terminal tax. It was further prayed that the petitioner be punished for the offence. The petitioner raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the complaint on the ground that it did not commit any offence. It was also contended that the complaint was barred by limitation under section 468(2) of the CrPC. The learned trial Court after hearing arguments took cognizance condoning the delay, hence this petition.

The solitary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the learned Magistrate committed an error in taking cognizance and condoning the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top