SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 965

R.P.GUPTA
K. K. Patnayak – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Y.P. Sharma for applicants; B.P. Singh for non-applicant.

JUDGMENT

Three petitioners in this revision challenge the order dated 22.1.94 of II Addl. Sessions Judge, Sidhi in S.T. No. 26/92 whereby prayer of these petitioners to discharge was declined. These petitioners along with Shyamnarayan were tried for offences u/s 306, 498A, 201 IPC. Wife of Shyamnarayan Satyabhama received some bums on 20.7.90. She was brought to N.C.L. hospital Amroli where Dr. (Smt.) K.K. Patnayak was Dy. Supdt. She gave treatment to the patient and referred her to N.C.L. Hospital, Singroli the same day, She was taken to the Singroli hospital same day. At Singroli petitioner 2 and 3 Dr. Ashok Sharma and Dr. S.K. Mishra had treated her. She expired on 27.07.90. The incident occurred at 1.30 p.m. and the patient was referred to Singroli that very evening. On the death of the patient one of the doctors sent information to the police on ·the basis of which marg intimation was recorded and since the parents of the deceased complained of harassment and cruelty to the deceased by the husband who is another accused in the case, it ultimately resulted in preparation of the charge-sheet for offences u/s 306, 498A IPC. These petitioners were also sent for trial along with t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top