SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 496

D.P.S.CHAUHAN
Anand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Satish Sharma for petitioner; S.K. Seth for respondent No. 1 to 3; Rajneesh Jain for respondent No.4.

JUDGMENT

Petitioner Smt. Anand Singh was the President of Municipal Council Maihar. She was elected as the President from General Category. She was removed by the State Government in exercise of the power under section 41-A of the M.P. Municipalities Act. 1961 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as "the Act') vide order dated 3.6.99, which is Annexure P-13 to the petition. Another order dated 8.6.99. Annexure P-14 to the petition, was passed by the Collector Satna, whereby for day-to-day working till further arrangement is made, the Vice-President was handed over the charge.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner made two-fold submissions. Firstly, that the order dated 8.6.99, Annexure P-14 to the petition, is in violation of section 37 of the Act which requires that for the office of the President, the President shall be nominated from the elected Councillers belonging to such reserved category, and secondly, the impugned order of removal of the petitioner was not passed after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the same was in violation of principle of natural justice.

So far as the first submission is concerned, the sam








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top