SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 289

S.C.PANDEY
Mukesh D. Ramtek – Appellant
Versus
Keshar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramesh Shrivastava for appellant; Ramesh Verma for respondents.

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal against the order dated 25.9.1998, passed by 12th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, in MCA No. 100/97, arising out of the order dated 6.11.1997, passed by Rent Controlling Authority, Jabalpur, in Case No. 2-A/90(i)/96-97.

This appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 25.9.1998, passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, in exercise of its power, under section 11 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (henceforth 'the Act').

It has been argued by learned counsel for the appellant that the power to fix interim rent was not appealable before the learned Additional District Judge and, therefore, the order of remand dated 25.9.1998, passed by 12th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, be set aside and the order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority under section 11 of 'the Act' dated 6.11.1997 be maintained.

As against this, learned counsel for the respondent argued that this is an exceptional case, where the Court below was entitled to entertain an appeal against the interim order. It was submitted that the appellant-tenant had filed an application for fixation of standard rent, when the respondent filed a civil suit for his ejectment.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top