SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 241

A.K. Mishra, J.
Mithumal v. Ku. Kavita
W.P. No. 443 of 2003 (J); Decided on 10.2.2003.

Advocates:
Ashok Lalwani for petitioners; M.K. Verma for respondent No.1.

Headnote:Civil P.C. 1908 -- O. 8 R. 1 proviso (amended) -- written statement not .filed within 90 days after order of the Court -- may be filed even thereafter -- sufficient reasons for delay have to be furnished -- Court may permit filing of written statement on cost -- it is for doing complete justice between parties.

        flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk] 1908& &vk- 8 fu-1 ijarqd ¼la‘kksf/kr½ & U;k;ky; ds vkns‘k ds i‘pkr 90 fnu ds Hkhrj fyf[kr dFku Qkby ugha fd;k & rRi‘pkr Hkh Qkby fd;k tk ldrk gS & foyac ds fy, i;kZIr dkj.k fn, tkuk gksrs gSa & U;k;ky; [kpZ ij fyf[kr dFku Qkby djus ds fy, vuqKkr dj ldrk gS & ;g i{kdkjksa ds e/; iw.kZ U;k; djus ds fy, gSA

JUDGMENT

Written statement has been filed though belatedly, however, the Trial Court has refused to take it on record as per impugned order (P-8) dated 2.1.2003. Relying on the provisions of Order 8 Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, the Trial Court felt bound by the limitation of 30 days and not beyond 90 days prescribed in Order 8 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Order 8 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code is quoted below :-Written Statement. -- The defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him, present a written statement of his defence:

Provided that where the defendant fails to file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day, as may be specified by the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, but which shall not be later than ninety days from the date of service of summons.

Order 8 Rule 1 requires the defendant to file the written statement within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him. In case he fails to file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day, as may be specified by the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, but which shall not be later than ninety days from the date of service of summons. As per section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Court can extend period for doing of an act not exceeding thirty days in total even though time fixed for doing of act may have expired. The procedural provision inserted in Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC intends to expedite the trial. In case written statement is not filed within time limit of 90 days prescribed in Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC Court may be justified in closing the right to file written statement.

However, it does not mean that if written statement is filed in the Court explaining the reasons for delay in exceptional cases, Court cannot take written statement on record subject to payment of cost if case has not progressed substantially. After closing of the right to file written statement Court can take written statement on record to do complete justice between parties, at the same time case is not to be delayed. In the instant case, written statement has been filed in the circumstances of the case, the same deserves to be taken on record~ Subject to payment of the cost of Rs. 500/- the written statement is directed to be taken on record. The cost be paid within fifteen days from today. The writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top