Back
S.S.JHA
Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Appellant Surendra Singh was prosecuted for an offence under section 307 and 332 IPC and other appellants were prosecuted for an offence under section 307 read with section 34 and 332 IPC. The trial Court convicted appellant Surendra Singh and remaining appellants for an offence under section 332 IPC and remaining appellants for an offence under section 353 IPC.
According to prosecution on 4.8.1991 head constable Ram Kishan (PW 9) alongwith constable Sunil Kumar (PW 10) and Ramesh Kumar (PW 13) had gone for investigation in Crime No. 95/91 for an offence under section 341, 506B/34 IPC. While searching the accused they reached bus stand of My ana. At the bus stand they met Hariom, Mahendra Surendra, Shyam and Ramswaroop. Constable Ramesh arrested Hariom and Surendra. Surendra with an intention to cause death has stabbed Ramesh on the right side of his chest. Head constable Ram Kishan caught Hariom, then Hariom assaulted him on the underarm of the right hand by stabbing a knife. Mahendra, Shyam and Ramswaroop have beaten Ramesh and they have taken away Hariom and Surendra from the custody of police officer. FIR was lodged by constable Ramesh Kumar at police station M
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
