SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 163

P.C.AGARWAL
Narayani Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chandra Rathore – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K. Shukla for appellant; S.C. Dubey for respondent.

JUDGMENT

The trial court by impugned judgment and decree dated 17.7.1997 ordered judicial separation under S. 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act ('Act' for short) and awarded Rs. 200/- per month as permanent alimony to the appellant-wife from the date of decree. The appellant has challenged only the amount of permanent alimony in this appeal.

The marriage was ceremonized in 1978. As per trial Court, the respondent treated the appellant with cruelty and has kept another woman as his wife. Parties cohabited only for six to seven months after the marriage and are living separate for last twelve years. As per appellant, respondent runs a shop of waste material. He owns truck which he drives himself. The respondent was injured in the truck accident but has recovered now. The respondent claimed that he has a hand cart in which he keeps his stock in trade. His monthly income does not exceed Rs. 1,500/-. His two younger brothers and mother who live jointly with him are dependents on him. His wife Rambai works as a tailor. He admitted· that he was injured in truck accident. He offered to keep the appellant in a separate rented house. During cross-examination he admitted execution of agree




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top