Back
A.M.SAPRE
Baboo Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
The petitioner has suffered an externment order under the provision of Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990. (In short, hereinafter called "The Act") in case No.1 of 2000, dated 14.11.2002, passed by District Magistrate, Indore. Having suffered this order, petitioner went up in appeal under section 9 of the Act before the State Government. By order dated 3.6.2003 (Annexure P-2) the State Government i.e. Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal and affirmed the externment order. It is against this appellate order, the petitioner is before this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Heard Smt. V. Phaye, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record of the case, I find no substance in this writ, which is worth admission.
In my opinion, the District Magistrate was perfectly justified in coming to its conclusion that the case for externment of the petitioner from Ratlam and adjacent Districts namely -- Dhar, Mandsour, Jhabua and Ujjain is made out. The petitioner was consistently found indulging in several heinous and serious criminal offenc
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
