SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1029

A.M.SAPRE
Baboo Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Smt. V. Phaye for petitioner.

JUDGMENT


The petitioner has suffered an externment order under the provision of Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990. (In short, hereinafter called "The Act") in case No.1 of 2000, dated 14.11.2002, passed by District Magistrate, Indore. Having suffered this order, petitioner went up in appeal under section 9 of the Act before the State Government. By order dated 3.6.2003 (Annexure P-2) the State Government i.e. Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal and affirmed the externment order. It is against this appellate order, the petitioner is before this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Heard Smt. V. Phaye, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record of the case, I find no substance in this writ, which is worth admission.


In my opinion, the District Magistrate was perfectly justified in coming to its conclusion that the case for externment of the petitioner from Ratlam and adjacent Districts namely -- Dhar, Mandsour, Jhabua and Ujjain is made out. The petitioner was consistently found indulging in several heinous and serious criminal offenc







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top