SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 713

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA, A.K.MATHUR
Metro Marins – Appellant
Versus
Bonus Watch Co. (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaideep Gupta for appellants; Raju Ramachandran for respondents.

JUDGMENT


Hegde, J. -- Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Leave granted.

The appellant herein questions the correctness of an order by the appellate Bench of the High Court at Calcutta which by the impugned order set aside the order made by a learned Single Judge on the original civil jurisdiction of that Court in GA No. 682 of 1999 in CS No. 99 of 1999. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:

The respondent herein filed a suit for possession alleging the appellant herein to be a licensee and the period of licence having expired he was entitled to a decree for khas possession of the suit schedule property as also for certain other ancillary reliefs. In the said suit he filed an interlocutory application, firstly praying for a judgment on admission and in the alternative, for an injunction directing the appellant herein to immediately hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the suit schedule property premises to the respondent-plaintiff. The learned Single Judge who heard the said application came to the conclusion that he did not find any reason to pass a decree on admission or to grant interim mandatory injunction directing th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top