SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 132

A.K.TIWARI
Samrath Madhuriya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.L. Nagar for applicants; Ku. Madhu Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.5.2003 passed by learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam, in Criminal Appeal No. 191/2002.

Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to this revision are that Police, Ratlam, filed a charge-sheet against the appellant and one other accused person Bhagirath S/o Munnalal under section 5/25 (1) (a), Arms Act, whereupon a criminal case was registered against the said persons. Bhagirath died during the pendency of the trial, therefore, applicants alone were tried by the trial Magistrate for the commission of the offence punishable under section 25 (1) (a) of Arms Act and after trial, they were convicted for the commission of the above said offence and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- each vide judgment and order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratlam, in Criminal Case No. 185/2002, on 14.11.2002. Feeling aggrieved by the above said order of conviction and sentence, applicants preferred an appeal, which was rejected by the learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam, vide the impugned judgment and order. Hence, the appella








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top