Back
A.K.TIWARI
Samrath Madhuriya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.5.2003 passed by learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam, in Criminal Appeal No. 191/2002.
Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to this revision are that Police, Ratlam, filed a charge-sheet against the appellant and one other accused person Bhagirath S/o Munnalal under section 5/25 (1) (a), Arms Act, whereupon a criminal case was registered against the said persons. Bhagirath died during the pendency of the trial, therefore, applicants alone were tried by the trial Magistrate for the commission of the offence punishable under section 25 (1) (a) of Arms Act and after trial, they were convicted for the commission of the above said offence and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- each vide judgment and order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratlam, in Criminal Case No. 185/2002, on 14.11.2002. Feeling aggrieved by the above said order of conviction and sentence, applicants preferred an appeal, which was rejected by the learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam, vide the impugned judgment and order. Hence, the appella
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
