SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 59

S.K.SETH
C. K. Asati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Dalal petitioner; Vinay Zelawat for respondents.

JUDGMENT

This order shall also govern the disposal of Writ Petitions No. 1433/2004, 1558/2004 and 1559/2004 as the common question of law and facts involved in all the cases. For the sake of convenience, the facts of W.P. No. 143212004 may be noticed.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated 10.11.2004 issued by the respondent No.3 - Executive Engineer, CPWD, Indore Central Division No.1, Indore whereby the application submitted by the petitioner for issuance of tendor documents was rejected.

The facts lie in narrow compass. One Smt. Chandrakala Asati was running a proprietary concern. She was a registered civil contractor. Later on, Smt. Chandrakala Asati and 4 other persons formed a partnership firm in the name and style of M/s. C.K. Asati. This aforesaid partnership firm was duly registered by the Registrar of Firms & Societies. The respondents floated a NIT which is available on record as Annexure P-2. One of the condition mentioned in the NIT was as under:

"The tender shall be issued to approved and eligible contractor of CPWD, non-CPWD contractor shall also be eligible to tender provided they have satisfactorily completed 3 similar works each of value Rs.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top