S.K.SETH
C. K. Asati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
This order shall also govern the disposal of Writ Petitions No. 1433/2004, 1558/2004 and 1559/2004 as the common question of law and facts involved in all the cases. For the sake of convenience, the facts of W.P. No. 143212004 may be noticed.
Petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated 10.11.2004 issued by the respondent No.3 - Executive Engineer, CPWD, Indore Central Division No.1, Indore whereby the application submitted by the petitioner for issuance of tendor documents was rejected.
The facts lie in narrow compass. One Smt. Chandrakala Asati was running a proprietary concern. She was a registered civil contractor. Later on, Smt. Chandrakala Asati and 4 other persons formed a partnership firm in the name and style of M/s. C.K. Asati. This aforesaid partnership firm was duly registered by the Registrar of Firms & Societies. The respondents floated a NIT which is available on record as Annexure P-2. One of the condition mentioned in the NIT was as under:
"The tender shall be issued to approved and eligible contractor of CPWD, non-CPWD contractor shall also be eligible to tender provided they have satisfactorily completed 3 similar works each of value Rs.
2. M/s. Avula Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Sr. Div =AIR 1999 (AP) 318
1. New Horizons Limited & another v. Union of India & others = (1995) 1 SCC 478
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.