SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 553

S.H.KAPADIA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Prem Chand Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Yashpal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Hiren Dasan with Chanchal Kr. Ganguli for appellant; Amit Singh Chadha for respondents.

JUDGMENT


Pasayat, J. -- Leave granted.

Challenge in this appeal is to the legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court holding that the proceedings initiated on the basis of a complaint alleging infraction of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short "the Act") was not maintainable. Therefore, the proceedings were quashed; allowing the petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short "the Code").

Background facts filtering out unnecessary details are as under:

The complaint was filed by the appellant alleging that in the year 199'5 respondent 1 had issued a cheque for a sum of Rs. 5,15,053.72 representing balance amount payable to the appellant for supply of goods to a partnership firm of which the respondents are partners. It was indicated that the total amount payable was Rs. 49,21,482.72 as against which the accused persons had paid Rs. 44,06,429, leaving balance of Rs. 5,15,053.72. A cheque [drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Ladwa Branch (Account No. 954)] was issued for the same amount on 27.1.1995. The cheque was signed by respondent 1 Yashpal Singh, fo































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top