SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 787

RAKESH SAKSENA
Anil Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Daulat Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
V.S. Chaudhary for applicant; None for non-applicant.

JUDGMENT

Applicant has filed this petition under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 100/2003 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sagar and/or the order dated 28.1.2003 passed in aforesaid case taking cognizance against the applicant under section 294, 506-II IPC and section 3 (l)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

In brief, facts of the present case are that applicant had entered into a contract with respondent Daulat Prasad for construction of his house. This agreement was entered into on 3.9.1998. There were some disputes about the construction and about the amount of money to be paid to respondent contractor. On 6.2.2002 respondent-complainant filed a private complaint against the applicant on the allegations that because of the dispute in respect of the contract applicant did not pay his money which was outstanding for the construction. When on 16.4.2000, he demanded his money, applicant told him "Ja be Chamara Tera Hisab Ho Chuka Hai Jo Dekhe Kar Lena Is Prakar Jatigat Apman Apsabdo Dwara Karte Hue Anavedak Ne A vedak Se Kaha Tujhe J an Se Khatm Karva Fikwa Dunga. " Aggrieved t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top