SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1026

A.M.NAIK
Suresh Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Gwalior – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Newaskar for petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Order dictated in open Court. Case of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 purchased the property vide registered sale deed dated 10.1.2000 from its previous owner. He made construction of a Chabutra on the colony road on the area where the property is situated. It is further stated that construction is without permission from the Municipal Corporation, Gwalior and the same is liable to be removed under section 307 (5) of M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Municipal Corporation did not submit its reply. However, respondent No.2 refuted the allegations made in the application. It was contended by respondent No.2 that he has not made any illegal construction. He also pleaded that there was 110 colony road as alleged by the petitioner. Learned trial Court after recording evidence dismissed the application with a finding that it is clear from the evidence that construction of Chabutra has not been made on the property of the petitioner. It has been further observed that the disputed construction is alleged to have been made on a public way and section 307 (5) of the aforesaid Act has no applicability.

The order is absolutely ill











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top