SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 795

AJIT SINGH
Nizumal Haque – Appellant
Versus
Phool Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Tiwari for applicant.

ORDER

1. Heard on admission.

2. This revision is directed against the order dated 18.2.2003 passed in Criminal Case No. 77/2002 by the Presiding Officer, Family Court, Rewa, whereby she has directed the applicant to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month each to his minor children non-applicants No. 1 to 4.

3. The applicant was married to Mumtaz. He has now divorced her. Non-applicant Nos. 1 to 4 are their minor children. Mumtaz and non-applicant Nos. 1 to 4 filed an application for grant of maintenance allowance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code"). The trial Court has held that the applicant despite having sufficient means is not maintaining the non-applicant Nos. 1 to 4 without any justified cause. The trial Court has also held that the non-applicant No. 1 to 4 are unable to maintain themselves. The trial Court has directed the applicant to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month each in favour of non-applicant Nos. 1 to 4 and rejected the claim of Mumtaz for maintenance allowance on the ground that she, having been divorced, is not entitled .for maintenance allowa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top