SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1132

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Vandana – Appellant
Versus
Angad Singh Jadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Gopi Chourasiya for applicant; Ajay Sen for respondent.

ORDER

1. The applicant wife has preferred this petition under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transferring the case Hindu Marriage Case No. (C.O.S.) 80-N05 instituted by the respondent under section 13 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from the Court of II Upper District Judge, Chhindwara to the Court of Multai having competent jurisdiction for its further trial.

2. As per averments of the application, the applicant was married with the respondent on 7.3.1988 and also gave birth two daughters and one son out of this wedlock. Since 1996 the applicant was given cruel treatment by the respondent on non-fulfilment of his illegal demand of dowry. She was beaten by him in this period also and by neglecting she was insisted to live with her poor parents at village Bhuyari post Sonegaon, Tahsil Multai. District Betul. She had no source of income. Thus, on having been neglected by the respondent. she moved an application under section 125, Criminal Procedure Code for maintenance in which she was granted Rs. 800/- per month from the respondent, but such order of the trial Court dated 31.7.2004 is still sub-judice in criminal revision pending before the Additional Ses














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top