U.C.MAHESHWARI
Vandana – Appellant
Versus
Angad Singh Jadav – Respondent
1. The applicant wife has preferred this petition under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transferring the case Hindu Marriage Case No. (C.O.S.) 80-N05 instituted by the respondent under section 13 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from the Court of II Upper District Judge, Chhindwara to the Court of Multai having competent jurisdiction for its further trial.
2. As per averments of the application, the applicant was married with the respondent on 7.3.1988 and also gave birth two daughters and one son out of this wedlock. Since 1996 the applicant was given cruel treatment by the respondent on non-fulfilment of his illegal demand of dowry. She was beaten by him in this period also and by neglecting she was insisted to live with her poor parents at village Bhuyari post Sonegaon, Tahsil Multai. District Betul. She had no source of income. Thus, on having been neglected by the respondent. she moved an application under section 125, Criminal Procedure Code for maintenance in which she was granted Rs. 800/- per month from the respondent, but such order of the trial Court dated 31.7.2004 is still sub-judice in criminal revision pending before the Additional Ses
1. Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay and another reported in = [AIR 2002 SC 396]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.