SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 532

A.K.GOHIL, S.S.DWIVEDI
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Roop Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S. Gokhale, Government Advocate for State; Amitabh Upadhyay for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Gohil, J. -- 1. State of Madhya Pradesh has preferred this appeal under section 378 CrPC against the judgment dated 8.5.1997 in Sessions Trial No. 452/96 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mhow, Indore, challenging the acquittal of the respondent under section 307, IPC and instead conviction under section 324, IPC and sentenced to the period of already undergone which was around one year.

2. As per prosecution story, the incident took place on 23.5.1996 at about 3.00 p.m. when complainant Roop Singh was present at his house. Accused Roop Singh came there and started abusing. Complainant came out from his house and asked accused that whey he is abusing. Thereupon accused who was carrying Darata (a sharp edged weapon) in his hand, assaulted on the complainant and gave 5-6 Darata blows. As a result of these assaults the injured received as many as five incised wounds on the different parts of the body. The matter was reported, crime was registered. The matter was investigated and charge-sheet was filed.

3. During trial, Roop Singh (PW 1) and Sajanbai (PW 2) supported the prosecution story. The story was narrated by Roop Singh to Sajanbai. Though the others h




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top