Back
U.C.MAHESHWARI
Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
Radha Sharan – Respondent
1. The appellant-defendant has called in question the judgment and decree dated 28.1.1991 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Raisen in Civil Regular Appeal No. 3-A/89 reversing the judgment and decree dated 4.2.1989 regarding dismissal of the suit passed by the Civil Judge Class-I Bareli in Civil Original Suit No. 3-A/84.
2. A suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction was filed by respondents with pleadings that one Amrit Lal Dubey was the owner of a dilapidated house situated at Bareli Bazar. This house also had a small passage, so called 'Gali'. One portion of this house adjoining to this 'Gali' was purchased by the appellant vide sale deed dated 18.4.1962 from said Amrit Lal Dubey which is described with the red colour in the map annexed with the sale deed. Subsequent to this transaction the remaining part of this house was purchased by the respondent vide 'sale deed dated 16.7.1972. According to it remaining part of the said house after selling to the appellant was transferred to the respondent. The said 'Gali', subject matter of this suit had remained towards eastern side of the house of respondents and just behind the house of the appellant. The
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
