SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1207

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
Radha Sharan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K. Jain for appellant.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant-defendant has called in question the judgment and decree dated 28.1.1991 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Raisen in Civil Regular Appeal No. 3-A/89 reversing the judgment and decree dated 4.2.1989 regarding dismissal of the suit passed by the Civil Judge Class-I Bareli in Civil Original Suit No. 3-A/84.

2. A suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction was filed by respondents with pleadings that one Amrit Lal Dubey was the owner of a dilapidated house situated at Bareli Bazar. This house also had a small passage, so called 'Gali'. One portion of this house adjoining to this 'Gali' was purchased by the appellant vide sale deed dated 18.4.1962 from said Amrit Lal Dubey which is described with the red colour in the map annexed with the sale deed. Subsequent to this transaction the remaining part of this house was purchased by the respondent vide 'sale deed dated 16.7.1972. According to it remaining part of the said house after selling to the appellant was transferred to the respondent. The said 'Gali', subject matter of this suit had remained towards eastern side of the house of respondents and just behind the house of the appellant. The

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top