SHANTANU KEMKAR
Asaf Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. By filing this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.9.2005 passed by the second respondent District Magistrate Rewa externing the petitioner from districts of Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Shahdol, Umaria and Anuppur for a period of one year and the appellate order dated 24.10.2005 passed by the third respondent Commissioner, Rewa by which his appeal has been dismissed.
2. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 8.8.2005 issued by the second respondent under section 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for short 'Adhiniyam'), mentioning the reasons for proposed order to be passed against him. The petitioner submitted his reply on affidavit denying and explaining the allegations levelled against him. After giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner the second respondent held that the petitioner is liable to be externed and consequently passed the order of externment. Feeling aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal under section 9 of the Adhiniyam before the third respondent. The third respondent by order dated 24.10.2005 dismissed the petitioner's appeal No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.