Back
SHANTANU KEMKAR
Asaf Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. By filing this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.9.2005 passed by the second respondent District Magistrate Rewa externing the petitioner from districts of Rewa, Satna, Sidhi, Shahdol, Umaria and Anuppur for a period of one year and the appellate order dated 24.10.2005 passed by the third respondent Commissioner, Rewa by which his appeal has been dismissed.
2. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 8.8.2005 issued by the second respondent under section 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for short 'Adhiniyam'), mentioning the reasons for proposed order to be passed against him. The petitioner submitted his reply on affidavit denying and explaining the allegations levelled against him. After giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner the second respondent held that the petitioner is liable to be externed and consequently passed the order of externment. Feeling aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal under section 9 of the Adhiniyam before the third respondent. The third respondent by order dated 24.10.2005 dismissed the petitioner's appeal No.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
