Back
B.M.GUPTA
Prakashchand – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Heard on admission.
Heard finally at motion stage.
On 15th January, 2006 one teacher Satish Chandra Saxena committed suicide by hanging. This merg was reported to the police on which enquiry was conducted and the police came to the conclusion that the petitioner had advanced loan to the deceased at the rate of 10% interest and the deceased was annoyed by the demands of loan made by the petitioner, hence he committed suicide. FIR was registered at crime No. 116/06 and as informed by Shri Dixit the investigation has been completed. This action of the police has been impugned by the petitioner vide this petition.
2. During the course of arguments Shri Dwivedi, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court on the following judgments:
1. Sanju @ Sanjay Singh v. State of M.P. [2002 (2) JLJ 275 = 2002 CAR 255 (SC)].
2. Mahendra Singh v. State of M.P. [1995 Supp. (3) SCC 731].
3. Ajay Patodia v. State of M.P. [2003 (II) MPWN 153 = 2003 (3) Crimes 543].
4. Laxmi Prasad Vishwakarma v. State of M.P. [2003 (1) MPWN 34].
5. Mamta Sahu v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2006 (1) Crimes 11].
and has submitted that if the allegation of adv
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
