Back
MANJUSHA P.NAMJOSHI
Aneeta Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Joshi – Respondent
1. This revision is under section 397 read with section 401, Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Applicant and non-applicants are wife and husband. By an order dated 15.2.1999 in MJC No. 187/1997 under section 125, Criminal Procedure Code the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal had passed an order in favour of applicant granting maintenance of Rs. 1,000/- per month to be paid by the non-applicant. Thereafter, the husband moved an application under section 127, Criminal Procedure Code for cancelling the order of maintenance before the Family Court which was registered as MJC No. 1178/2002. The Family Court by its order dated 10.5.2005 ordered that the wife Aneeta has sufficient means to maintain, hence the order of Judicial Magistrate was set at nought.
3. Against this the applicant Aneeta Joshi has come before this Court.
4. On perusal of the record, it appears that Aneeta had registered herself as an Advocate and had started practice in Bhopal Court since 1998. In 1999 on 15.2.1999 the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal passed an order of maintenance in her favour. When the husband Subhash moved an application under section 127, Criminal Procedure Code the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
