SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 496

MANJUSHA P.NAMJOSHI
Aneeta Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Joshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Abadulla Usmani for applicant; B.M. Dwivedi for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. This revision is under section 397 read with section 401, Criminal Procedure Code.

2. Applicant and non-applicants are wife and husband. By an order dated 15.2.1999 in MJC No. 187/1997 under section 125, Criminal Procedure Code the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal had passed an order in favour of applicant granting maintenance of Rs. 1,000/- per month to be paid by the non-applicant. Thereafter, the husband moved an application under section 127, Criminal Procedure Code for cancelling the order of maintenance before the Family Court which was registered as MJC No. 1178/2002. The Family Court by its order dated 10.5.2005 ordered that the wife Aneeta has sufficient means to maintain, hence the order of Judicial Magistrate was set at nought.

3. Against this the applicant Aneeta Joshi has come before this Court.

4. On perusal of the record, it appears that Aneeta had registered herself as an Advocate and had started practice in Bhopal Court since 1998. In 1999 on 15.2.1999 the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal passed an order of maintenance in her favour. When the husband Subhash moved an application under section 127, Criminal Procedure Code the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top