SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 856

S.C.VYAS
Mahesh – Appellant
Versus
Sanat Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Manana for petitioner; Smt. Madhulika Nahar for respondent.

ORDER

1. The order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhanpura, Mandsaur in Criminal Revision No. 96/2006 on dated 11.5.2006 whereby order dated 8.4.2006 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhanpura in Criminal Complaint No. 13/2005 was confirmed, is under challenge in this petition presented by the petitioner under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, requesting to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court and to quash both these orders.

2. The present petitioner is facing prosecution under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act before learned JMFC, Bhanpura, on the allegation that two cheques of Rs. 50,000/- and Rs. 75,000/- respectively issued by the present petitioner herein were dishonoured by the Bank due to insufficiency of funds and the amount was not paid by him despite demand. During trial prosecution witnesses were examined thereafter, petitioner herein entered in his defence' and when the matter was at the stage of advancing final arguments then an application under section 91 of Criminal Procedure Code was filed, wherein a request was made, summon FIR lodged by the complainant (respondent herein) regarding theft of his GPF amount as wel













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top