SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 637

S.K.GANGELE
Mahesh Kumar Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Newaskar, Deputy Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

Gangele, J. -- 1. Petitioner has filed this petition challenging the order Annexure P-l dated 8.1.2004. By the aforesaid order the period of absence of the petitioner from 24.11.2002 to 21.7.2003 total period of 240 days have been declared as dies non.

2. As per the petitioner when he was working as Manager in District Commerce and Industries Centre, Morena (M.P.) a show cause notice was issued to him mentioning the facts that he was absent from duty w.e.f. 24.11.2002 to 21.7.2003 near about 240 days and he did not submit any application for the aforesaid period of absence, hence, why the aforesaid period be not treated as dies non.

3. Earlier, the petitioner did not receive salary for certain period for the year of 2003. He filed a petition before this Court which was registered as WP No. 622/03 and this Court disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioner or assign reasons for non-payment of salary. Thereafter, the aforesaid show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted his reply. He specifically mentioned that he was present on duty from 24.11.2002 to 21.7.2003. He further submitted that he was worki






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top