SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 574

SHANTANU KEMKAR
Ashok Kumar Patel – Appellant
Versus
Ram Niranjan – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P. Mishra with Vibudhendra Mishra for petitioners; Sharad Gupta for respondents.

ORDER

1. Through this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the order dated 28.9.2006 passed by the II Civil Judge Class II, Mauganj, District Rewa in Civil Suit No. 55A/04 by which while deciding the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') he has issued a commission for investigating the facts as to (i), who is in possession of the suit land, (ii) who is raising construction on it or on the part of it and (iii) as to how many plots are situated on the disputed land.


2. Shortly, stated the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the respondents. In the said suit the petitioners also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC for grant of temporary injunction praying therein that during the pendency of the suit the respondents/defendants be restrained from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit land and be also restrained from making construction or alienation of the suit property or any part thereof.

3. In the reply of the said application for temporary injunction the respondents/defendants denied the averme






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top