Back
A.P.SHRIVASTAVA
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.8.2001 passed by the Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act [hereinafter it shall be referred to as the Act, 1985], in Special ST No. 5/2000 by which the appellant has been convicted under section 8/20 (b) (i) of the Act, 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years with a fine of Rs. 4,000/with default stipulation.
2. In short, the facts of the case are that on 1.9.2000, the complainant G.A. Khan, ASI, out-post Ruthiai, got information from the informant that the appellant is having contraband articles in his possession. The entry in the roznamcha sanha was made and the matter was informed to the SDOP on telephone. Then went to the spot alongwith the force near the Railway Station. The party went to the house of the appellant and informed about the facts for illegal possession and plantation of Ganja plants. Consent was obtained from the appellant and the house of the appellant was searched. 750 gms Ganja was recovered alongwith cash of Rs. 1,891. In the garden also, 8 plants of Ganja were also found. The panchnama was prepared and two samples of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
