SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 881

K.S.CHAUHAN, S.S.JHA
Brij Kishore Palod – Appellant
Versus
D. M. Engineering (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikram Johri for petitioner.

ORDER

1. This is an application for re-admission of FA No. 303/02. Affidavit of party is not tiled. The affidavit is sworn before the Oath Commissioner. We arc finding in number of cases that Oath Commissioners are administering oath in the cases which are to be tiled before the High Court.

Under the Oath Commissioner Rules, the Oath Commissioners are appointed for administering oath on affidavit for the civil Courts Subordinate to High Court.

2. Therefore, it is necessary that the Oath Commissioners be intimated that they arc appointed to administer oath under the Commissioner of Oath Rules. 1976 for the civil Court under the superintendence of High Court.

3. As prayed by counsel for appellant, two weeks is granted to tile detained affidavit or the appellant.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top