VINEY MITTAL
Nandkishore – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent
1. The present appeal has been filed by appellant-claimant Nand kishore, who was injured in an accident on November 13, 1997 and had suffered a fracture of the pelvic bone and a rupture of urinary tract, 1 besides some other injuries.
2. The appellant has been awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,05,000/- by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore and has claimed enhancement of compensation in the present appeal.
3. The factum of the accident and the injuries suffered by appellant Nandkishore have not been disputed by the respondents.
Dr. Chandrashekhar Thatte, Urologist has appeared as AW 1 and has proved his medical report and certificates issued by him to the injured. It has been opined by the aforesaid doctor that urinary tract of the claimant injured had been severely damaged and required a surgery for bringing the same to normal. The doctor has also opined that on account of the injuries suffered by the injured, he had been rendered temporarily impotent and was unable to perform sexual intercourse.
Dr. Narendra Patidar, Consulting Surgeon of Gokuldas Hospital, Indore has also appeared as AW 3. Dr. Patidar has proved the fact of injured Nandkishor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.