SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 20

VINEY MITTAL
Nandkishore – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Jain for appellant; Shailendra Mukati for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. The present appeal has been filed by appellant-claimant Nand kishore, who was injured in an accident on November 13, 1997 and had suffered a fracture of the pelvic bone and a rupture of urinary tract, 1 besides some other injuries.

2. The appellant has been awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,05,000/- by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore and has claimed enhancement of compensation in the present appeal.

3. The factum of the accident and the injuries suffered by appellant Nandkishore have not been disputed by the respondents.

Dr. Chandrashekhar Thatte, Urologist has appeared as AW 1 and has proved his medical report and certificates issued by him to the injured. It has been opined by the aforesaid doctor that urinary tract of the claimant injured had been severely damaged and required a surgery for bringing the same to normal. The doctor has also opined that on account of the injuries suffered by the injured, he had been rendered temporarily impotent and was unable to perform sexual intercourse.

Dr. Narendra Patidar, Consulting Surgeon of Gokuldas Hospital, Indore has also appeared as AW 3. Dr. Patidar has proved the fact of injured Nandkishor








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top