SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 1041

RAJENDRA MENON
Gajanand Awasthy – Appellant
Versus
Sharif Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Gupta for petitioner; A.V. Bharadwaj for respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. Challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is made to order Annexure P-l dated 14.1.2005 passed by First Additional District Judge, Guna in Civil Suit No. 42-A/04 whereby petitioner is directed to pay stamp duty and penalty on the document for the purpose of taking it on record and admitted it in evidence.

3. Facts in brief necessary for disposal of this petition are that petitioner had filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sale dated 29.12.2002 Annexure P-2. The written statement was filed and respondent defendant denied the execution of the agreement and contended that agreement dated 29.12.2002 is a forged and fabricated document, it is not signed by defendant/respondent. During the pendency of the proceedings, an application under Order 13 Rule 3 of the CPC was filed and agreement dated 29.12.2002 was produced. An objection was raised with regard to improper stamping of the said document. The said document was executed after payment of only Rs. 50/- as stamp duty. It was stated by the respondent that under Article 23 of the Schedule 1 (A) of the Indian Stamp Act the stamp duty is to be paid as the document con
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top