SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 559

A.K. Patnaik, C.J. and Sanjay Yadav, J.
Leelawati and another v. State of M.P. and others
Writ Petition No. 1988 of 2008 (J); Decided on 30.4.2008.*

Advocates:
Abhishek Arjaria for petitioners; Vivekanand Awasthy, Government Advocate for respondents.

Headnote:(1) Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Aphiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- Ss. 70 (1) and 86 (2) -- Panchayat Karmi not appointed by Gram Panchayat even after direction under S. 70 (1) -- can be appointed by Prescribed Authority under S. 86 (2) -- it can authorise Chief Executive Officer for the purpose. [Para 4

        (2) Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 91 -- M.P. Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 -- Rr. 3 & 5 -- Panchayat Karmi not appointed according to scheme of State Government -- this can be challenged in appeal or revision under the rules. [Para 6

        ¼1½ iapk;r jkt ,oa xzke Lojkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 70 ¼1½ rFkk 86 ¼2½ && /kkjk 70 ¼1½ ds v/khu funsZ‘k ds i‘pkr~ Hkh xzke iapk;r }kjk iapk;r dehZ fu;qDr ugha fd;k x;k && fofgr izkf/kdkjh }kjk /kkjk 86¼2½ ds v/khu fu;qDr fd;k tk ldrk gS && og bl iz;kstu ds fy, eq[; dk;Zikyd vf/kdkjh dks izkf/kd`r dj ldrk gSA ¼iSjk 4½

        ¼2½ iapk;r jkt ,oa xzke Lojkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 91 && e-iz- iapk;r ¼vihy rFkk iqujh{k.k½ fu;e] 1995 && fu- 3 rFkk 5 && iapk;r drhZ jkT; ljdkj dh ;kstuk ds vuqlkj fu;qDr ugha fd;k x;k && ;g fu;eksa ds v/khu vihy vFkok iqujh{k.k esa vk{ksfir fd;k tk ldrk gSA ¼iSjk 6½

ORDER

Patnaik, C.J. -- 1. The petitioners are permanent residents of Gram Panchayat, Baroli in Tahsil Ajaygarh. The Gram Panchayat, Baroli failed to appoint a Panchayat Karmi within the specified period and, therefore, the Collector in exercise of power under section 86 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (for short 'the Adiniyam') authorised the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ajaygarh to appoint a Panchayat Karmi of Gram Panchayat, Baroli. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ajaygarh issued an advertisement inviting applications for appointment of Panchayat Karmi in Gram Panchayat, Baroli. Petitioners and other candidates applied in pursuance to the advertisement to the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ajaygarh. Thereafter, the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ajaygarh appointed the respondent No.6 as Panchayat Karmi of Gram Panchayat, Baroli. Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed this writ petition under. Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. Mr. Abhishekh Arjaria, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that under section 70 of the Adhiniyam only the Gram Panchayat can appoint a Panchayat Karmi and hence the appointment of respondent No.6 as Panchayat Karmi made by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ajaygarh is without jurisdiction and is void ab initio.

3. We are unable to accept the aforesaid submission of Mr. Arjaria Section 86 of the Adhiniyam is quoted herein below:


"86. Power of State Government to issue order directing Panchayat for execution of works in certain cases. -- (1) The State Government or the Prescribed Authority may, by an order in writing, direct any Panchayat to perform any duty imposed upon it, by or under this Act, or by or under any other law for the time being in force or any work as is not being performed or executed, as the case may be, by it and the performed or execution thereof by such Panchayat is, in the opinion of the State Government or Prescribed Authority, necessary in public interest.

(2) The Panchayat shall bound to comply with direction issued under sub-section (1) and if it fails to do so (the State Government or the Prescribed Authority shall have all necessary powers to get the' directions complied with at the expense, if any, of the Panchayat) and in exercising such powers it shall be entitled to the same protection and the same extent under this Act as the Panchayat or its officers or servants whose powers are exercised."

It will be clear from sub-section (1) of section 86 of the Adhiniyam that the State Government and the Prescribed Authority may by an order direct any panchayat to perform any duty imposed upon it by or under the Act or under any other law for the time being in force. It will be further clear from sub-section (2) of section 86 of the Adhiniyam that the panchayat shall be bound to comply with the direction issued under subsection (1) and if it fails to do, the State Government or the Prescribed Authority shall have all necessary powers to get the directions complied with at the expense, if any, of the panchayat and in exercising such powers it will be entitled to the same protection and the same extent under the Act as the panchayat or its officers or servants exercise such powers.

4. In the instant case, it is not disputed that Collector who was the Prescribed Authority issued a direction to the Gram Panchayat, Baroli to perform its duty of appointing a Panchayat Karmi under section 70 (1) of the Adhiniyam and that the Gram Panchayat, Baroli failed to comply with such directions. Hence, under sub-section (2) of section 86 of the Adhiniyam, the Collector as the Prescribed Authority had the power to get this direction complied with. Under sub-section (2) of section 86 of the Adhiniyam the State Government or the Prescribed Authority also have all necessary powers to get the directions complied with. The expression "all necessary powers" will include the power to auth







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top