VINEY MITTAL
Jaswani Bhai Doshi – Appellant
Versus
Indore Municipal Corporation – Respondent
1. This order shall dispose of seven writ petitions being WP No. 3185 of 2008, WP No. 4818 of 2008, WP No. 4837 of2008, WP No. 4389 of 2008, WP No. 4881 of 2008, WP No. 5027 of 2008 and WP No. 5028 of 2008, as the controversy in all these cases is identical and similar arguments have been addressed before this Court. For the sake of convenience, the facts are borrowed from WP No. 3185 of 2008.
2. The petitioner is the sole proprietor of the firm M/s Metal Equipment Enterprises and had purchased land bearing survey No. 176 measuring one acre, situated at Pipliyarao, Tehsil and District Indore, from the original owner Harakchand Naluja Shah through a registered sale-deed dated March 1, 1972. A copy of the aforesaid sale deed has been appended as Annexure P-1 with the present petition. After having become the owner of the said land, the petitioner constructed a shed on the said land after getting the plan sanctioned from the Competent Authority of Indore Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred as the respondent-corporation). The petitioner also claims that he is regularly paying the property tax qua the said property to the respondent-corporation. In a portion of
1. Chairman Indore Vikas Pradhikaran v. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemicals Ltd. and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.