SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 790

S.C.SINHO
Kewal Kumar Jaggi – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Sahu – Respondent


ORDER

1. This order shall govern the disposal of aforesaid two MCrC under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code because the same legal point (complaint under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was signed by non-applicant advocate on basis of memo of appearance duly signed by non-applicants) is involved in both the cases. Learned JMFC Jabalpur in RT No.29/2003 and 193/2002, dismissed the objection raised by applicant on the ground of maintainability.

2. These complaints under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as to "Act 1881") was filed by respondents with the signature of his advocate Shri Surendra Verma. Applicants filed an application for quashing the complaint on the ground that these complaints have been filed without the signature of the complainant and they are signed by their advocate on the basis of memo of appearance.

As the learned Magistrate in impugned order dated 12.12.2005 has held that he has already taken cognizance therefore he cannot go behind orders. Feeling aggrieved these petitions under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code are filed before this Court.

3. The only disputed question before me is that what will be























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top