SHANTANU KEMKAR
Prajapal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. The relevant facts of the case briefly are that petitioner applied for the appointment to the post of Gram Panchayat Karmi in Gram Panchayat, Balodiya District Mandsaur. The Gram Panchayat adopted the resolution dated 8.6.2002 for the appointment of the petitioner as Gram Panchayat Karmi. Aggrieved, the 4th respondent Ramchandra filed an appeal under section 91 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (For short "Adhiniyam") before the Sub Divisional Officer. The Sub Divisional Officer did not find any illegality in the resolution by which the petitioner was selected and appointed as Panchayat Karmi. He accordingly dismissed the appeal filed by the 4th respondents vide order dated 31.1.2003 (Annexure P-12).
3. Aggrieved, the 4th respondent filed Revision No. 52/02-03 before the Additional Collector Mandsaur. The Additional Collector Mandsaur vide order dated 28.7.2003 (Annexure P-13) allowed the revision holding that on perusal of the record of Gram Panchayat it appears that the petitioner has been wrongly selected. It has been further observed that in spite of there being othe
5. Ram Lakhan Rawat v. State of M.P. and others = [2000 (1) JLJ 280
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.