SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 891

R.S.JHA
H. R. Kaurav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K. Dixit for petitioner; Om Namdeo, Government Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioner, who at the relevant time was working as a Sub-Inspector, has filed this petition praying for quashing of the charge-sheet issued to him on 26.11.1990 and for a further direction to the respondents not to proceed further in the Departmental Enquiry initiated against the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was already being prosecuted for the same charges before the Competent Criminal Court in Sessions Trial No. 82/1992 pending before the First Additional District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mandla. It is relevant to state that the petitioner had initially filed this petition before the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal and by interim order dated 11.9.1996 further proceedings in the Departmental Enquiry initiated against the petitioner were stayed. The interim stay, granted by the Tribunal, continues tilt date.

2. During the pendency of the petition the petitioner has filed an application for taking documents on record on 10.1.2002 and has placed the judgment of the First Additional District & Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mandla, dated 28.4.2000 passed in Sessions Trial Nos. 82/90 and 72/93 and Special Case No. 28/94 on









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top