SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 58

R.S.GARG, U.C.MAHESHWARI
Keshav Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dhantobai – Respondent


Advocates:
U.K. Jain for petitioner; B.D. Jain for respondents.

ORDER (Oral)

Garg, J. -- 1. The plaintiff being aggrieved by the order dated 4.9.2008 passed by the learned Xth Civil Judge, Class-I, Gwalior in Civil Suit No. 154A/2008 where under plaintiffs application filed under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC was rejected, has come to this Court with a submission that the learned Court below contrary, to the legal provisions, has rejected the application without appreciating that provision contained in Order 26 Rule 9 CPC are for providing assistance to the Court and are not for creating complication in the matter.

2. The short facts necessary for disposal of the present case are that the plaintiff filed the Civil Suit with a submission that he is owner of Survey No. 282 admeasuring 1 Bigha and 2 Biswa and two constructions in dispute have been made upon Survey No. 282 on part thereof and as defendant is creating problems, declaration and appropriate injunction be granted against the defendants. The defendants appeared in the Court and inter alia pleaded that the suit construction is in Survey No. 307 and that the plaintiff is not the owner of Survey No. 282 or at least of the part whereon construction has been raised. Before commencement of the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top