SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 139

A.K.PATNAIK, AJIT SINGH
Arun Singh Bhadoriya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajendra Tiwari for petitioner; V. Awasthy, Government Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 2.

ORDER

Patnaik, C.J. -- 1. The petitioner is working as Samvida Shala Shikshak Class II in the Government School, Sada (Goram), Block Mehgaon, District Bhind. He applied pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission on 26.2.2007 inviting applications for 240 posts of Civil Judge (Entry Level) in the Lower Judicial Services. He was allowed by the M.P. Public Service Commission to take the preliminary examination on 15.5.2007 and after being successful, he was allowed to take final examination conducted by the M.P. Public Service Commission on 5.8.2007. Since he was successful in the final examination, he expected that he will be called for interview by the M.P. Public Service Commission but he was not called for the interview. He came to learn subsequently that he was not called for the interview because he had completed the upper age limit of 35 years as on 1.1.2008 and was, thus, not eligible for recruitment to the post of Civil Judge (Entry Level). Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. Mr. Rajendra Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top