SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 784

A.K.PATNAIK, SUBHASH SAMVATSAR
Sudheer Singh Tomar – Appellant
Versus
Jiwaji University – Respondent


Advocates:
M.P.S. Raghuvanshi for appellant; Tapan Trivedi for respondents.

ORDER

Patnaik, C.J. -- 1. This appeal under section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 is against the order dated 6th July, 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.2670 of 2009, under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The facts in brief" are that the appellant is a student of M.Sc. Computer Science at S.M.S. Government Model Science College, Gwalior. In the second semester of the course, he secured less than 36% in the aggregate in both theory and practical courses separately as well as less than 26% in the subject of Data Base Management Systems. He was, however, promoted to the third semester and he took the examination of the concerned second semester in the subject of Data Base Management Systems and secured 26% marks in the second semester. After completing the third semester examination, he was not allowed to sit in the fourth semester examination by the Jiwaji University, GwaUor keeping in view the provisions of clause (9) and (10) of the Ordinance 38 made under the Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam, 1973). Aggrieved by the action of the respon









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top