(SUPREME COURT)
Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Ashok Kumar Ganguly, JJ.
Aviral Bhatia v. Bhawna Bhatia
Transfer Petition No.431 of 2008 (Cri.) with T.C. No. 1052 of 2008(C);
Decided on 18.2.2009.
It appears that there were some irreconcilable differences between the parties and despite concerted and serious efforts the parties were not able to resolve their disputes and were Li"Ving separately since 10.10.2007. It appears that after the transfer petitions were filed before this Court, learned counsel for the parties made efforts to bring about a comprehensive settlement of the disputes relating to the matrimonial discord. The Mediation Centre of the Delhi High Court also played a vital role in arriving at a settlement.
That both the parties agree and undertake that all the cases/complaints in any forum or Court which have been filled by the parties and their family members against each other including the ones listed above will be treated as compromised and settled in terms of the present application of divorce by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and this Court may also pass order for quashing of criminal proceedings as mentioned above. [Para 1
Held : In view of the factual situation and the settlement arrived at by the parties we direct that a decree of divorce by mutual consent be passed. All the proceedings referred to above which are pending shall stand quashed. We record our appreciation for the effective manner in which the Mediation Centre of Delhi High Court helped the parties to arrive at a settlement. [Para 2
fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e] 1955 && /kkjk 13[k && Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq- 142 && varj.k ds yafcr ekeyksa ds fy, dh xbZ vftZ;ksa esa fd;k x;k ifjfu/kkZj.k && ikjLifjd vk/kkj ij fookg&foPNsn dh fMdzh ikfjr djus ds fy, izkFkZuk dh xbZ && fMdzh Lohd`r djus dh izkFkZuk Hkh dh xbZ && lHkh yafcr ekeys Hkh vfHk[kafMrA izdV gksrk gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; dqN lqyg u gks ldus okys erHksn Fks rFkk la;qDr rFkk xaHkhj iz;klksa ds ckotwn i{kdkj vius fooknksa dk fuiVkjk ugha dj lds rFkk 10-10-2007 ls i`Fkd jg jgs FksA izdV gksrk gS fd bl U;k;ky; ds le{k varj.k ;kfpdk,¡ Qkby djus ds i‘pkr~] i{kdjksa ds fy, fo}ku dkmUlsyksa us oSokfgd >xMksa ls lacaf/kr fooknksa ds O;kid ifjfu/kkZj.k djus ds fy, iz;kl fd,A fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; ds e?;drk ¼chp&cpko½ dsUnz us Hkh ifjfu/kkZj.k djus esa thoar Hkwfedk vnk dhA ;g fd nksuksa i{kdkj lger gS rFkk opu nsrs gSa fd fdlh Qksje ;k U;k;ky; us Åij lwphc) lesr lHkh ekeys@f‘kdk;rsa tks i{kdkjksa rFkk muds dqVqafc;ksa }kjk ,d&nwljs ds fo:) Qkby fd, x, gSa le>kSrk fd, gq, ekus tk,axs rFkk Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuq- 142 ds v/khu ikjfLifjd lgefr }kjk fookg&foPNsn ds orZeku vkosnu ds fuca/kuksa ds vuqlkj r; fd, tk,axs rFkk ;g U;k;ky; Åij mfYyf[kr nkafMd dk;Zokfg;k¡ vfHk[kafMr djus ds fy, vkns‘k Hkh ikfjr dj ldrk gSA ¼iSjk 1½ vfHkfu/kkZfjr % rkfF;d fLFkfr rFkk i{kdkjksa }kjk fd, x, ifjfu/kkZj.k dks n`f"V esa j[krs gq, ge funsZ‘k nsrs gSa fd ikjfLifjd lgefr }kjk rykd dh fMdzh ikfjr dh tkuk pkfg,A Åij fufnZ"V lHkh dk;Zokfg;k¡ tks yafcr gSa vfHk[kafMr gksaxhA ge izHkkoh <ax ds fy, viuk foospu vfHkfyf[kr djrs gSa ftlesa fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; ds e/;drk ¼chp&cpko½ dsUnz us i{kdkjksa dh ifjfu/kkZj.k djus esa lgk;rk dhA ¼iSjk 2½
Dr. Pasayat, J. -- 1. These transfer petitions have been filed by Aviral Bhatia (hereinafter referred to as the "husband") seeking transfer of several cases pending before learned Chief Judge, Family Court, Gwalior, in proceedings under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short "the Act") and section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short "the Code"). The parties were married on 20.1.2006 at Surajkund, Haryana. It appears that there were some irreconcilable differences between the parties and despite concerted and serious efforts the parties were not able to resolve their disputes and were living separately since 10.10.2007. It appears that after the transfer petitions were filed before this Court, learned counsel for the parties made efforts to bring about a comprehensive settlement of the disputes relating to the matrimonial discord. The Mediation Centre of the Delhi High Court also played a vital role in arriving at a settlement. The details of the litigations between the parties are as follows :
(i) The petitioner has filed a case/petition under section 13(1)(ia) read with section (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 titled Aviral Bhatia v. Bhawna Bhatia bearing case No.48/07 which is pending in the Court of Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, ASG Gurgaon, Haryana.
(ii) Respondent has filed a case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 being complaint case No.3086/1/2007 dated 3.11.2007, under section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, which is pending in the Court of Ms. Veena Rani Metropolitan Magistrate at Patia1a House, New Delhi.
(iii) Respondent has filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in Gwalior bearing No.501(a)/07 against the petitioner pending before Ms. Saroj Maheshwari Jain, Chief Justice, Family Court, Gwalior. The said proceedings have been stayed by this Hon'ble Court in the Transfer Petition No.1052/2008.
(iv) Respondent has filed a petition u/s 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 being case No.435 of 2007 titled as Bhavna Bhatia v. Aviral Bhatia, pending before Ms. Saroj Maheshwari Jain, Chief Justice, Family Court, Gwalior (M.P.). The petitioner has filed a transfer petition for the transfer of this matter bearing Transfer Petition No.431/ 2008 and such proceeding has been stayed by this Court in the Transfer Petition No.431/2008.
(v) Respondent has filed an FIR bearing No.68/2007 dated 26.11.2007, against petitioner and his family members under section 406 r/w 34 and 498A of the IPC read with section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act which is pending investigation in Mahila Police Station Padav, Gwalior.
(vi) That petitioner's father has filed a case bearing Case No. 18664/ 1/08 titled as M.K. Bhatia v. Chitvan Sharma and others u/s 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120B pending before the Court of Mr. Sudesh Kumar M.M. Patiala House, New Delhi.
(vii) The petitioner has filed two transfer petitions bearing TP(C) No.1052 of 2008 and TP(Cri.) No.431 of 2008 before this Court inter alia praying transfer of the petition u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the respondent pending before the Chief Justice, Family Court at Gwalior and transfer of proceedings under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 filed by respondent pending before the Chief Judge, Family Court at Gwalior (M.P.)
The agreed terms of settlement are as follows:
"That the petitioner agrees and undertakes that he shall pay an amount of Rs.12 lacs (Rupees Twelve lacs) to respondent in the form of a pay order in favour of Ms. Bhavna BhatIa, at the time of making of statements/grant of divorce/quashing of all the criminal and civil proceedings as a full and final settlement of all her claims. Further more the petitioner agrees and undertakes to hand over all the household articles as mentioned in settlement dated 14.11.2008 before Ld. Mediator of High Court of Delhi in the presence of both the parties, which are lying at House No.E-8/l0, 3rd floor, Malviy
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.